You are reading a page from History of the Insurance Company of North America of Philadelphia
The oldest fire and marine insurance company in America (1885)
Part of the American Term Life Insurance History Project
Term Life Insurance
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.47

                           V.
                   MARINE BUSINESS.
TN" THE meanwhile, the business of the Company had
     grown rapidly, unaffected by the want of early suc-
     cess in obtaining a charter.  The stated committees
of the Board sat regularly to pass upon all applications.
Mr. Hazard had opened the books and wrote the first
policies, and in a few days a clerk was voted him, Mr.
William Coulthard being appointed at five hundred dollars
per annum.  A porter was engaged, John Valentine Cline,
for " £6 per month and an hint of a douceur at Christ-
mas."  And before the month was out another clerk, John
Cook, was appointed.  In the following March, Samuel
Young was appointed Surveyor.
 The first policy was issued to Convno'ham, l^esbitt &
            j.               «,                                               '                             */       c-*                /
Co., on the  ship  America,  James Ewing, Master, from
Philadelphia to Londonderry, for $5,333.33, at 2^ per cent.;
and the second on goods in same ship, for $3,200.  Policy
Xo. 3 was to John Leamy on goods on board the brig
Margarita, Anthony Arnaud, Master, from Philadelphia
to Xew Orleans, with liberty to touch aud trade at Cape
Francois, for i;?l,500, at 3 per cent.   Policy ]STo. 10 on
tlic 15th was to the President, Directors and Company of
the Bank of the United States, on cash laden after the 10th
insfc.  on  board  any vessel,  any  Master, from  Charleston,
48                  A HISTORY OF THE
South Carolina to Philadelphia or :N"ew York, for $20,000,
at 1 per cent.
 The form of policy employed was that in use by the local
underwriters at the time, Mr. Hazard writing at the head
in the usual blank, the name of the underwriter:
           " The Afsurance Company of North America."
The Committee on Policy reported later a recommendation
to delay printing their own until the result was known of
their  application for a charter.   The first six months
showed the premiums received $62,114.33, and premiums
determined $8,910.19.  The first loss was the ship In-
dustry^ amounting to $4,000, which was paid 10 June,
and a few days later their second claim was met, $515 74,
on the sloop Betsey.  The interest account amounted to
$3,276.20, and early in July the first dividend was declared
and paid to stockholders, being six per cent. on the first
and second instalments of the paid capital, and which
amounted to $7,975.28.  The second six months' premium
receipts were $151,350.98, and the determined premiums,
$69,184.21; interest was $3,574.41, and the losses amounted
to $19,474.64.  The second dividend was realized to the
stockholders in January, 1794, being six per cent. on the
first,  second  and  third  instalments of the  paid  capital,
amounting to $14,400.  With these satisfactory returns
to the stockholders, the motive for the change of base
of the opponents of the company's incorporation can be
seen; and as the profits of an organized business of under-
writing were so manifest, these opponents were now only
too eager to share in them, and instead of thwarting the
      INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.   49
desired incorporation, only asked that they also might he
incorporated.
  A form of marine policy for their owr- use appears to
have been considered on 27 March, 1793, and was submitted
to Messrs. Jared Ingersoll and William Tilghman, two
gentlemen learned in the law, for their opinion whether it
would secure the property of the individual members (other
than their interest in the company's funds) from legal claims
for losses; but conclusions on this do not appear to have
been reached until after incorporation, as a form for the
company's policy was only -finally agreed to on 9 May, 1794,
and at the same meeting "the Draft of a Device for Seal,
presented by Mr. Blodget, was approved of."  This seal
remains unchanged to this time.
  It had not been long before the brokers found their clients
preferred the solidity of a wealthy association preferable to
the credit of an individual underwriter, and brought their
applications to the company claiming a commission thereon;
but the board on 27 March, 1793, declined to "write for the
private offices and allow the brokers two and a half per
cent., they guarantying the premiums"; and realizing its
strength, made public advertisement of their rules, and
invited  orders to be addressed directly to the company.
  The following were adopted at the same meeting when
the form of policy was adopted, as the "rules to be observed
in transacting business with the Insurance Company of
yorth America'1':
 "1. All orders for Insurance must be given in writing,
signed by the Applicant; and as minute a Description of the
50                  A HISTORY OF THE
Vessel is expected as the person ordering the Insurance can
give, respecting her Age, Build, how found and fitted, and
whether double or single decked.
 "2. All Policies will be ready for Delivery in Twenty-four
hours after the order for Insurance is accepted at the office,
and the Policy must be taken up in Ten Days.
 "3. Notes with an approved Endorser for all Premiums
must be given in Ten Days, payable as follows:
  "For American and West Indian Bisques, in Three
Months after the Date of Policy.
  " For European Risques, in Six Months.
  " For Indian and China Risques, in Twelve Months.
  " For Risques by the Year, in Eight Months.
  "For Risques for any lesser Time, in Three Months.
  "4. Losses will be paid in Ten Days after Proof and
Adjustment; but if the Note given for the Premium shall
not have become due within that Time, the amount of it
shall nevertheless be deducted from the Loss to be paid."
  Their advertisement gave "notice to all whom it may
concern, that agreeably to "the above rules they are ready to
receive all orders for Insurance which may be addressed to
them, accompanied with Directions to some responsible
House in Philadelphia, for the payment of the Premiums
within the time limited.  In case the Risques offered shall
be approved, the Insurance shall be immediately effected,
otherwise notice shall be given either by answer to the
Person applying, or his agent in Philadelphia, as may be
ordered."
By the Prefident and Directors ofthelnfurance Company of North America.
      INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.   51
  On 8 July it was "Agreed, That Notes be received for
Premiums to New Orleans, payable in Four and an half
months."  On 20 January, 1794, finding that policies were
not always paid for promptly, the board ordered "in order
the more certainly to enforce the payment of Premiums in
due Season, no Policy be subscribed by the President until
the Premium is paid, or a note given for the same in the
accustomed manner."  And with the precision of banking
rules on discounts, they ordered "That all Inquiries for In-
surances left at this office before 12 o'clock in the mornino-
                                                       0
shall be answered at or before three o'clock on the same
Day, and all Inquiries left after Three o'clock and before
Six o'clock, shall receive an answer at or before Ten o'clock
on the succeeding Day."
  The matter of office hours was considered on 15 January,
1795, and it was resolved,
  "That the office shall be open for the Transaction of
Business from Nine O'clock in the morning to Two in the
Afternoon; and from Four in the Afternoon til Eight in
the Evening.  That the attendance of the Secretary be
required from Ten to Two, and from Four to Eight in the
afternoon.  That it shall be the Duty of the President to
attend this office every Day from Eleven O'clock in the
Forenoon until Two o'clock in the afternoon, and from Five
o'clock in the afternoon until Eight o'clock.  And that it
shall be the Duty of the Committee of the Week to attend
every day from Twelve o'clock until Two in the afternoon,
and from Six till Eight o'clock."
 And in regard to applications for insurance the rules of
the previous January were affirmed.
52                  A HISTORY OF THE
 On 2 March, 1795, "on the question shall so large a Sum
as $35,000 be taken in future on "Risques of the first
Dignity, it was unanimously agreed in the affirmative";
showing the extent to which the policies of the company
were sought by the large shippers of the country.  On 8
May, 1809, the lines had been increased to $40,000.
 The difficulty of investing the accumulating funds of the
company led to the question of loaning on Respondentia,
which was reported favorably upon by a committee on 17
November, 1794; and on 16 March following, on receipt of
an application for such a loan from Captain Tingey, the
board decided unanimously to make such loans, and on the
30th "it was agreed that five thousand dollars should be
lent to Capt. Tingey on Respondentia, at Eighteen Months'
credit, at twenty-five per cent. (including premium of in-
surance) for the eighteen months."  A form for Responden-
tia Bond was approved 13 April.  On 21 May the President
and Committee of the Week were authorized "to write open
policies in cases in which they may judge it expedient, and
at such a premium as they shall think adequate to the risk."
By the minutes of 8 May, 1809, the loans on Respondentia
were limited to $20,000.  The amount of this business was
not large in the course of years, and proved unprofitable
in the aggregate, and was finally declined altogether.
  The success of the company during its early years was
certainly remarkable considering the period, for its begin-
ning was during the time of bitter warfare between Great
Britain and France, when both parties made free on the high
seas with any property afloat upon which they could make
any claim. "Our vessels began to be boarded and captured
       INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.   53
by the various parties engaged in the great European
struggle, and most of all by France, who mindless of her
Treaty of Alliance with us [6 February, 1778], as well as
of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce, which was con-
cluded upon the same da}7, entered upon a systematic course
of capture and confiscation." *  General Washington's pro-
clamation of neutrality of 22 April, 1793, was the inciting
cause to the depredations of the French on our commerce
as they claimed our neutrality was in violation of the treaty
of 1778.  So severe losses had already been experienced by
our shippers, that in less than a year, on 27 August, 1793,
they were invited by the Secretary of State, to throw their
claims in the hands of the government, and trust to it for
redress.   The drain on the company's resources became
heavy from these causes, yet they continued to take the
increased hazards, hoping an end might be reached to the
struggle.   In those days of slow communications, they
were earning heavy losses by both British and French
cruisers, and many months would elapse before the tidino-s
reached the office, and in the meanwhile they were issuing
policies which in turn might realize to them accumulating
losses.  The alarm of the board first finds expression on
12 October, 1795, when it was "resolved, that Messrs.
Ealston, Fry and Smith wait on the Secretary of State and
inform him that a Report, prevails that the French cruisers
have orders to Capture all vessels bound to British Ports
and request him to apply to the French minister to know
whether this is so or not."  On the 29 February following,
 * Address prepared by .Messrs. Wallis, Macaleater and Hilton by order of
the Convention of Claimants, held in New York, 13 October, 1856.
54                  A HISTORY OF THE
Messrs. Ball, Fry and Ralston were appointed a "Com-
mittee to arrange and state the claims of this company
against the Government of Great Britain, and the Captor
or others, into whose hands the Property may have came,
in cases of Capture and Depredation in the American
Trade, so far as concerns this Company, to consult Counsel
thereon if they find it expedient, and devise the proper
mode of prosecuting our claims arising thereon, either
through the Intervention of the Government of the United
States or otherwise."   On 16 April a committee was
appointed to confer with the Insurance Company of the
State of Pennsylvania and the private underwriters who
had appointed committees to meet and consider what steps
are necessary to be taken in the present state of affairs;
and at a meeting the following day the board adopted the
recommendation of the conference to- decline underwriting
any marine risk, peace risks excepted, "conditioned that it
be adopted by the other Insurers in Philadelphia."  But
this action was repealed on 12 September, as the recom-
mendation had not been carried into execution at the other
offices.    On 8 October another committee was raised to
"wait on the Secretary of State to obtain such further
information as he can furnish" on the order given by
France to capture neutral vessels in order to distress the
commerce of Great Britain, tidings of which had reached
them "through the Newspapers and in private letters
from England."  On 20 January, 1797, a committee was
appointed to form some rules for the Rates of Premiums
in view of "the late alarming intelligence concerning Cap-
tors and Seizures of American Vessels by French Cruizers."
      INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.   55
On 19 June, 1798, it was "agreed not to insure to French
ports unless with a warranty against capture and seizure
by the French."
  The United States sought in various ways redress from
the French government for these spoliations by the latter
upon the commerce of its people; but the French held the
United States to the stipulation of the treaty of 1778, in its
eleventh article, that the latter should guaranty to the for-
mer forever, against all other powers, its then possessions
in America.   This the United States could not now do
without certain collision with Great Britain, and this the
country was not in a condition to encounter.  France
claimed that the United States had proved faithless herein,
and pressed the claim against any redress for the spoliations.
The United States had in various ways sought release from
this guaranty, even offering a money equivalent for it, but
France would not forego the letter of the article.  Finally,
agreement was reached by the convention of 30 September,
1800, the result of which was the two nations renounced
their mutual pretensions, our government surrendering the
claims of her citizens in consideration of being released by
France from her guaranty.  " Thus did our government, after
long years of negotiation and angry contention on behalf
of the claimants, after having instructed its ministers
strenuously to insist upon indemnity for their wrongs, and
after having secured every acknowledgment of its justice
from tlie nation by whom it was due—by one act overthrow
the whole train which was in operation for their relief—
negotiate away their interests to secure public benefit, and
leave them helpless and defenceless."
56                   A HISTORY OF THE
 The claimants became alarmed at this turn of affairs and
promptly took steps looking to the United States for redress.
On 12 February, 1801, the directors "ordered that an
account of all illegal Captures made by the British and
French be made out for the purpose of representing the
same to the Government of the United States, and that the
President, if he should find it necessary, be empowered to
employ a person for that purpose."  On 6 March scales of
rates were adopted to meet these piratical hazards, as such
in fact they were, for the convention of September, 1800,
only referred to past and brought no exemption from future
spoliations';  after an effort to agree upon some  uniform
action with the other local underwriters had failed, the only
point of agreement between them being " that the risque of
seizure in Port ought not to be borne by the Assurers."
On 26 May a committee reported to the board that "the
number and amount of the Companies' claims on the British
Government for Spoliations on Property which they think
that nation ought to refund is about $981,355; other losses
occasioned to this office by Capture of the British and for
which there is no expectation of reimbursement is about
$78,800.   With respect to the Captures made by the
French, your Committee can only state that they amount to
about $1,952,730, and that they deem it much the Interest
of the Company to have them correctly arranged with all
their Proofs as soon as possible, in order to demand resti-
tution when such restitution may be expected."   On 14
December, 1802, the president reports his correspondence
with Mr. Hollins, president of the Maryland Insurance
Company, relating to the employment of "able Counsel to

     INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.   57
write in support of the claim which the sufferers by French
spoliations have upon tine G-overnment of the United States
in consequence of the late Treaty with France which pro-
hibits them from claiming from the French Government."
On 21 May following, the president was authorized to
confer with the presidents of other insurance companies, as
well as with private claimants, to take order respecting
applications to Congress on account of the. spoliations.
 But it is not needed to recite the various minutes of the
board in this grievance against the rational government,
nor the various steps taken by counsel and in memorial, to
seek redress from vear to vear, and how twice on the eve
                  /                            V              '
of success, a presidential veto. on ba-seless arguments, had
thrown the claimants back.  Between the years 1827 and
1846, twenty-two reports of committees, all in favor of the
claimants had been made in the two houses of Congress,
each by a bill, and for five millions dollars indemnity.  In
the first session of the Congress of 1840, both houses
united on a bill, which was vetoed by President Polk on
10 August, then on the eve of his war with Mexico.  The
claimants, however, returned to the matter in the following
session, and in January, 1855, both houses united on the
bill, which was in its turn vetoed by President Pierce on
17 February.  Each of the following Congresses witnessed
the introduction of measures of restoration, but tlie war of
1861 to 1865 prevented further consideration of the matter,
until in tlic XLV1I Congress a bill was introduced by
Senator Hoar, providing for a reference of these to the
Court of Claims, which passed 15 December, 1882, but did
not reach consideration in the House.  In the following
58                   A HISTORY OF THE
Congress the same bill was presented by Senator Frye and
passed the Senate, and reaching its passage in the House
14 January, 1885, it met the approval of President Arthur.
The Directors can now look forward to a period when the
corporation can secure some restitution for the heavy losses
of its early years.
  The claims for losses by British cruisers were met under
Mr. Jay's treaty, which was ratified in 1796, by which that
government "paid to the merchants of the United States for
captured vessels an indemnity amounting to $11,650,000."
The losses by Spanish cruisers, and those for which Spain
was responsible in harboring the prizes taken by the
French, were eventually settled by the treaty which secured
       7                                                       %/                                    /                                   */
to us the possession of Florida; and the directors in July,
1824, were enabled from this payment to make a dividend
of sixty per cent. to their stockholders; dividing $300,000,
when their surplus did not exceed $20,000.
 The marine business of the Company exhibited some
remarkable fluctuations; and as the directors of those early
days had not learned the lesson of a solid surplus, they
divided the profits to the stockholders, not forecasting the
storms which would come, and their want of thought in
this respect, more than once brought the corporation to the
brink of ruin.  The marine premiums written to the close
of the year 1793 amounted to $213,465.31, and the losses
paid, to $38,484.16.  In 1794 the premiums were $290,656.83,
and they increased to $1,304,208.91 in 1798, when they began
to decrease, and in 1802 they were but $103,902.26.  This
first decade showed premiums written $6,037,456.71, and
losses paid, $5,500,887.57.  Tlie premiums of 1802 were
     INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.  59
trebled by 1805, and again in 1806; but in 1808 the premiums
were but $5,843.55, and the losses, $108,568.93; and the
years 1809 to 1812 inclusive, showed an annual average
of but $45,449.   This  second decade g-ave premiums
$1,364,637.48, and losses paid, $1,583,836.47.   It will be
seen further on how different were the results during the
same periods of the fire business, though in magnitude of
premiums it seemed but a modest department of the com-
pany.  From 1813 to 1822 inclusive, the third decade, the
premiums written were but $276,764.30, while the losses
paid were $335,554.06.  The succeeding decade, 1823 to
1832 was yet more discouraging, for the premiums were
$160,138.70, and losses $227,954.57.   The years 1833 to
1842 noted the upward tendency, the premiums being
$428,584.16, and the losses only $358,332.78.  The decade
succeeding, gave the premium account, $2,855,189.98, and
the losses, $2,153,679.96.
 The company began its operations at a period in the
commerce of Philadelphia when its supremacy was acknowl-
edged, and when its capitalists and shippers had their
ventures in all quarters of the globe.  This sceptre gradually
passed from Philadelphia to its older neighbor ~New York,
and with the enlarging number of companies at home and in
other cities, and a reduction of rates, the lessening business
of the company can be explained.  Of their active associates
in the business in the city during the first third of a century
of their existence, the Phoenix (1803), Philadelphia (1804),
Delaware (1804), Marine (1809), United States (1810) and
Atlantic (1825), each  in its time closed  its  business,
evidencing the severe trials which marine underwriting in
60                  A HISTORY OF THE
particular underwent at that period; and the State of Penn-
sylvania and the Union (1804) alone survive to testify to the
struggles of those days.  Of the J^ew York companies who
were contemporary with these, the Knickerbocker, as the
successor of the old Mutual Assurance Company (1787)
and the Eagle (1806) alone survive, and the remainder,
namely, the ^N"ew York (1796), Associated Underwriters
(1797), United (1797), Columbian (1801),Washington Mutual
(1802), Marine (1802), Commercial (1804), Phoenix (1807),
Firemen's (1810), Ocean (1810), have all passed away.  The
oldest company in ~New York issuing marine policies is the
Sun Mutual, organized in 1841.  The oldest company in
Boston so writing is the American, organized in 1818.