You are reading a page from Cases and other materials on the Law of Insurance, George W. Goble (1931)
Part of the American Term Life Insurance History Project
Term Life Insurance
Previous Cases on Insurance Law (1931) Next

 

CREDITOR I\ DEBTORS PROPERTY   1.5

month he may live with me henceforth without any deduction whatsoever, which amount shall be a lien on my property."

She died intestate July 8th, 1868, leaving personal property of the value of $600, and a lot in said village upon which were the buildings in question. The principal value of the premises was in the buildings. One Armbrust was appointed administrator of her estate. Her indebtedness, other than that to plaintiff, was from $1,200 to $1,400. Her indebtedness to him was about $2,100. Plain-tiff continued in the use and occupation of the buildings. * * *

Defendant's counsel moved for a nonsuit on the ground of breach of warranty, and that plaintiff had not an insurable interest. The motion was denied, and defendant's counsel excepted. * * *

FOLDER, J. The plaintiff cannot maintain this action, unless he had an insurable interest in the buildings which were the subject of the risk taken by the defendants, and which were destroyed by fire. He seeks to found such an interest, upon the instrument in writing, executed by his wife after her marriage to him.

Without entering minutely into a consideration of the effect of the marriage upon her pre-existing obligations and liabilities to him, it is sufficient to say, that the instrument executed by her was based upon a consideration adequate to uphold her express promise; that though made by a married woman it was in due form to affect her separate estate; and that though a transaction between a wife and her husband, yet equity would have upheld and enforced it in his favor against her, had she lived, and will enforce it against her estate now that she is dead. By it, he was an equitable creditor of her estate, at the time of the insurance; but he was no more than a general creditor. Though the instrument contains the phrase, "shall be a lien on my property," no specific lien was there-by created, and so far as that instrument had effect, no more than a general equitable lien, yet to be enforced and made specific by a judgment in an equitable action. The plaintiff stood thereby in no better plight, so far as having an insurable interest in the buildings, than would have stood a creditor of the deceased wife, who held a judgment only, rendered and docketed against her, which would have become a general lien upon her real property. He did not stand in so good plight, but for other facts now to be mentioned. She had died after giving the instrument, leaving personal and only this real estate; a person other than the plaintiff had taken out letters of administration thereon; the personal estate was by much insufficient to pay the debts against her; and this real estate, including the insured buildings, would in the due course of administration, for a space of at least three years from the granting of letters of administration, be liable to sale for the purpose of meeting her liabilities, and it was the only fund to which the plaintiff could look for payment; the plaintiff was in the pos.


Previous Cases on Insurance Law (1931) Next