You are reading a page from The Mathematical Theory of Investment, Ernest Brown Skinner, (1913)
Part of the American Term Life Insurance History Project
Term Life Insurance

6   MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF INVESTMENT
   4. The first three terms of a progression are 3, 6, and 9. Find the num-
ber of terms when the sum of all the terms is 234.
   
5. Suppose that in Example 4 the sum were 225 and the remaining
data the same. What would be the value of TO ? What is the meaning of
the result ?
   
6. The first three terms of a progression are 3, 6,12.  Find the sum of
10 terms.
   
7. An elastic ball is dropped from a height of 20 feet, and each time it
strikes the ground it rebounds to one half the distance through which it
fell.  How far will it have traveled when it strikes the ground for the tenth
time?
   
8. Find the sum of the multiples of 3 that lie between 200 and 400.
   9. A body falling from rest falls approximately 16.1 feet the first
second, 48.3 feet the second, 80.5 feet the third, and so on. How far will it
fall in 10 seconds?
  
10. The value of the timber in a certain forest increases at the rate of
4% annually. If it was worth $10,000 at the beginning of a five-year period,
how much will it be worth at the end of the period ?     ,_  .^  .
  
11. Find the sum of five terms of the series           .  -  >,
             ——1—-, 5-2V6, 9V3-11V2, .
             V3+V2
  12. Prove that three numbers in arithmetical progression cannot be in
geometrical progression unless the common difference is zero.
  
13. Prove that three numbers in geometrical progression cannot be in
arithmetical progression at the same time unless the ratio is + 1.
  
3. Geometrical  progressions in which the number  of terms
increases indefinitely.  In every problem in progressions so far
considered the number of terms has been finite. There are, how-
ever, many important problems whose solution requires the con-
cept of a decreasing geometrical progression in which the number
of terms is indefinitely increased. An example will help to make
the concept clear. Suppose a stick 2 feet long is cut into two equal
parts, and one of these is cut into two equal parts, and so on, one
of the two parts into which a given piece is cut being bisected
each time. In this way a series of shorter sticks is obtained whose
lengths are 1, ^, y y ^g, and so on, each fraction having for its
                    
PROGRESSIONS               7
denominator a power of 2. These terms, as far as they go, form
a geometrical progression whose ratio is ^ and whose nth term
is given by                        /IV"1     1
                   ^:=1U =on^i-

The sum of n terms will be
                        
1

{
2/2-1

 
?-1 „  1
8=-;————=2-^

                        
T_l    2-1
                        2
 Consider now what happens if the process of bisection is car-
ried on indefinitely.  Two things are clear from the nature of
the problem: First, the length of the last piece becomes indefi-
nitely small, or, to use a customary phrase, the length of the last
piece tends toward zero as a limit. In the second place, however
far the process is carried on, the sum of all the pieces cut off
can never exceed 2, though it can be made to approach as near
to 2 as we please.  This is seen from the expression just found
for s, viz.                         .   l

2"-1

This relation may be written
                    
2-8=

2"-1

from which form it can be seen that the right member becomes
small at will when n is increased, and consequently the difference
2—8 may be made as small as we please. In such a case it is
customary to say that the limit of 2 — 8 is equal to 0, where
the term limit is used in accordance with a definition to be
formulated in the next chapter, and the relation is written
                       
lim(2-8)=0.
                       
n=oo
From this relation we deduce, by Theorem IV of § 4,
                          
lim 8=2,
                          
n=<»
and thus are brought back to the length of the stick in its
original condition.
8   MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF INVESTMENT
 To generalize these notions for any geometrical progression
whose ratio is numerically less than unity, consider the sum
                
«„ = a + ar + ar2 + ... + ar"~1,
where the subscript n is used to emphasize the fact that the sum
of n terms is under consideration.  By (Z>) of §. 2,
                          
a — ar"

                       
"  1-r
 ,.,      ,     .„         a     ar"
which may be written «„ = .—— — .——»
                        
a           ar"
or                      ^———8„=:;——
                      
1 _ ,-       °      1 _ r
If in this equation r be taken numerically less than unity, r"
will be smaller than r itself/and as n increases, r", and conse-
         
j'»A<^*
quently :,——, will tend toward zero as a limit. According to
the notation used in the stick problem above,
               
T    /   a           \     ,.      ar"       „
               
i^T^-8^11111!—^0'
and finally              lim^=,——                fE~)
                          
n=oo     1 — T
It is important to note carefully that equation (.£') does not
state that «„ is equal to ,——. The equation means just what it
says, namely, :.—— is the limit toward which «„ is tending, and
that by taking n large enough the difference between »„ and ——
can be made as small as we please. Its importance lies in the
fact that it furnishes a direct means for the solution of all prob-
lems like the stick problem. In that problem a = 1 and r = A.
Substituting these values in equation (-£'),
                      
lim «„ = ——— = 2.
                      
-  i-|
                      
PROGRESSIONS               9
Another example is the determination of the limit toward which
a repeating decimal like .333    tends. The repeating decimal
may be written in the form
                    
.3+.03+.003+---,
from which it is readily seen that the terms are in geometrical
progression, with the first term a = .3 and the ratio r == .1. If
these values be substituted in the right member of equation (-£'),
the result is                  '3    1
                          
l^l^S'
which is, as we know, the common fraction that gives rise to the
repeating decimal .333    In the same way we may find the com-
mon fraction which is the equivalent of any repeating decimal.
For example, the repeating decimal .23459459    is equivalent
to the decimal .23 increased by the geometrical progression
                  
.00459 +.00000459 +   ,
whose ratio is .001; consequently,
             
oo^n...   _o, ,00459  217

.23459459    =.23 +

1-.001  925

A geometrical progression in which the ratio is numerically
less than unity and in which the number of terms is increased
indefinitely is called an infinite geometrical progression.
                             
EXAMPLES
  1. Find the limit of the sum for each of the following infinite geomet-
rical progressions:      (a) 2 + .5 + .125 + ...,
                      
(b) V2 +1 +  1  +   ,
                      v /              -N/2
                      (c) V2-H+1+V2-1+--..
  2. "What common fraction is the equivalent of the repeating decimal
.237237  ?
  3. Find the c