You are reading a page from The Mathematical Theory of Investment, Ernest Brown Skinner, (1913)
Part of the American Term Life Insurance History Project
Term Life Insurance

64    MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF INVESTMENT
   If we -remember that we have, by formula (6),
                ,           l+i=eS,
and that the fundamental relation between nominal and effective rates of
interest may take the form             /     -\m
                               ^-(^y'
the formulas for compound interest, viz.
                                     
(i\mi>
                        ,=(l+0n=l^)
and                S = P(\ + i)" = p(l + ^Y",
are expressible in the simple forms
                                  s = e»<                                       (8)
and                           S = Pe^.                      (9)
  These forms justify the name "compound interest law," which was
applied to the relation            v = a*
at the close of § 18, for if we put 0s equal to the constant a, (8) becomes
                                  
S ^ CE y
where the variables are n and s instead of x and y, as in § 18.
  Formulas (8) and (9) are only two of many cases in which a simplifi-
cation is effected by means of the introduction of the force of interest.
                              
EXAMPLES
  1. By means of the exponential series, find the effective rate when the
nominal rate is .06 and the interest is compounded momently.
  
2. Find the force of interest corresponding to the effective rate .06.
  3. If the force of interest is .06, find the compound amount of $1259
for 3 years and 6 months.
  
25. Computation of compound interest.  The formulas
                           S=P(l+i')"
                                 
I   A""
                            =?!+"-)
                                \   m/
                            =Pe"5
are admirably adapted to computation by logarithms, but in order
to secure accurate results for compound amounts on principals
up to $10,000, one would need at least six-place logarithms.
                          
INTEREST                65
Compound amounts play such an important part in practical
affairs that compound-interest tables have been constructed for
all the rates in common use and for times up to one hundred
years.  Such a table gives the amount for unit principal, but the
amount for any principal is easily found by multiplication.
  
Table III gives the amount of 1 at compound interest at rates
U, H, 2, 2,L, 3, U, 4, U, 5, and 6% for times up to one hun-
dred years. ^The solutions of the examples that follow will show
how to use the table most expeditiously. A little care in noting
the number of decimal places that are required will often save a
considerable amount of work. For example, if the principal does
not exceed $100, four-place tables will give results accurate to
the cent, but if the principal is as large as $100,000, accurate
results cannot be obtained without tables carried out to at least
seven places. Eight-place tables would be still better.
  
If logarithms are not used in performing the multiplication,
it is well to begin with the left-hand figure of the multiplier, so
that unnecessary figures can be dropped out as the multiplica-
tion proceeds.  Indeed, it is not necessary to write down multi-
plicand and multiplier.
  ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE. Required the compound amount of $236.41
for 10 years with interest payable annually at 5%.
  The work may be arranged as follows: Using 6 places, we find from the
table that the amount of $1 for 10 years at 5% is 1.62889. By multiplication
we find    Amount of $200.00 for 10 years at 5% = $325.778
           Amount of  30.00 for 10 years at 5% =  48.866
           Amount of   6.00 for 10 years at 5% =   9.773
           Amount of    .40 for 10 years at 5% =    .651
           Amount of    .01 for 10 years at 5% =    016
           Amount of $236.41 for 10 years at 5% = $385.084
   By utilizing the properties of a power of a base the range of
the table may be considerably extended.  If, for example, we
wished to find the amount of $236.41 for 75 years at 5%, with
only a fifty-year table at hand, we could write
                s = $236.41 x (1.05)60 x (1.05)26
                 = $236.41 x 11.46740 x 3.38635.
 
66   MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF INVESTMENT
 The value of this product may be found by means of a table of
 six-place logarithms.
    If interest is convertible oftener than once a year, we can use
 the table for the rate ^ and for mn years. For example, to find
 the amount of 1 for 10 years at 5%, convertible semiannually,
 we have to look up the amount of 1 for 20 years at 2^%, con-
 vertible annually, since, by the formula, we have
                       
/     ()K\10X2
                    
s=(l-f-—)  =(1.025)20.
   If the time does not contain the conversion interval an exact
number of times, it will ordinarily be necessary to use logarithms
or straight-out multiplication to reach the result. If, for example,
we wish to find the amount of $250 for 5 years and 6 months at
5% when interest is payable annually, we must find the value
of the product           ^ ^ ^^
If a table of logarithms is not at hand, the value of (1.05)^ may
be found by the binomial theorem, or we may take the value of
(1.05)" from the table and find the value of (1.05)*, either by
the binomial formula or by simple root extraction.
                    MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES
  1. Find the compound amounts in the following examples:
     (a) $239.54 at 5%, convertible annually, for 6 years.
     (b) $250 at 5%, convertible annually, for 3 years and 6 months.
     (c) $300 at 5%, convertible annually, for 120 years.
     (d) $1000 at 6%, convertible quarterly, for 20 years.
  2. How long will it take for a sum to double itself at 5%, convertible
annually ?
  
3. At a certain university which had 4000 students in 1910 the attend-
ance has been increasing at the rate of 10% each year over the previous
year's attendance. If the rate of increase should be kept up, what would
be the attendance in 1920 ?
  4. A merchant starting out with a capital of $5000 finds that after
8 years his capital is $10,000. What has been the annual rate of in-
crease if the rate of increase is supposed to have been uniform through
the 8-year period?                                                  "